The older european loyalty to established religions and god was often replaced after the french revolution by? - loyalty to religion orcountry
a. devotion to the Pope
b. supported by the King and national governance
c. Loyalty to local leaders
d. strong loyalty to the military leadership
e. nationalism and loyalty to the nation
Friday, February 5, 2010
Loyalty To Religion Orcountry The Older European Loyalty To Established Religions And God Was Often Replaced After The French Revolution By?
3 comments:
I'm not 100% sure, but I would say, E.
I mean, or b. or e, e. Skewed
During this time the nation began to create and refine. While government policy has become more stable and starts to restore confidence in the religion to disappear. If politics is beginning to fail, and after the fall of Rome, people cling to religion.
In fact, none of the above. And if you have a mistaken view. "Religion" does not mean that belief in God or spirits. It comes from the Greek word "religious", which simply means "lifestyle". Thesism and deism means that they believe in God.
Incorrrect next answer would be "e". But this is a very complicated question that the implementation by the European citizens that were theism and the monarchy, the two conspiracies against the rights of the people connected. Torture was an important means of "church" is obeyed by parishiners, more than monarchies? This makes the people against theism and organized as a series of movements performed with what some call prejudiciously "of the Protestant Revolution. How was the fall of the Berlin Wall effectively by the Germans before the speeches of Ronald Reagan, the Protestant Reformation commit is the result of many centuries of anger over the brutality of the Catholic Church. But Protestants were not as innocent as a little less brutal.
Juis also on the issues, which resulted in my opinion, unfair questions. There are certain things that happened for several centuries before the French Revolution. These questions do not adequately address the influences that the people to revolt against the monarchy. Please note that all monarchies is to every person and thing in the realm of the monarchy, not a country (Saudi Arabia is not a country is the personal property of the Saudi family) are therefore still monarchies cons cons of democracy and human rights. Monarchies are so capricious in its excesses break that 600 took years for Britain, the wings of the monarchy in 1824, and England has not had a monarchy, there!
GreenPartyRon@usa.com
Post a Comment